| dataset_desc |
Influence of Two Methods of Dietary Restriction on Influence of Two Methods of Dietary Restriction on Life History and Aging in the Cricket Acheta domesticus
Influence of two methods of die…
This study investigates how two forms of dietary restriction (DR)—
Intermittent feeding (food given only at intervals), and
Diet dilution (normal feeding but with lower nutrient concentration)—
affect the growth, maturation, survival, and aging of the house cricket Acheta domesticus.
The purpose is to compare how different restriction strategies change life span, development, and compensatory feeding, and to evaluate whether crickets are a strong model for aging research.
🧬 Why This Matters
Dietary restriction is known to extend lifespan in many species, but mechanisms differ.
Fruit flies (Drosophila) show inconsistent results because of high metabolic demand and water-related confounds; therefore, crickets—larger, omnivorous, and slower-growing—may model vertebrate-like responses more accurately.
Influence of two methods of die…
🍽️ The Two Restriction Methods Studied
1. Intermittent Feeding (DR24, DR36)
Crickets receive food only every 24 or 36 hours.
Key effects:
Total daily intake drops to 48% (DR24) and 31% (DR36) of control diets.
Influence of two methods of die…
They show compensatory overeating when food becomes available, but not enough to make up the deficit.
2. Dietary Dilution (DD25, DD40, DD55)
Food is mixed with cellulose to reduce nutrient density by 25%, 40%, or 55%.
Key effects:
Crickets eat more to compensate, especially older individuals, but still fail to match normal nutrient intake.
Influence of two methods of die…
Compensation is weaker than in intermittent feeding.
🧠 Major Findings
1. Longevity Extension Depends on the Restriction Method
Intermittent Feeding (DR)
Extended lifespan significantly.
DR24 increased longevity by ~18%.
DR36 extended maximum lifespan the most but caused high juvenile mortality.
Influence of two methods of die…
DR mainly extended the adult phase, meaning crickets lived longer as adults, not because they took longer to mature.
Diet Dilution (DD)
Effects varied by dilution level.
DD40 males lived the longest of all groups—164 days, far exceeding controls.
Influence of two methods of die…
Their life extension came not from slower aging, but from extremely delayed maturation.
Thus, DR slows aging, while DD often delays growth, creating extra lifespan by extending the immature stage.
2. Growth and Maturation Are Strongly Affected
DR caused slower growth, delayed maturation, and smaller adult size in females. Males sometimes became larger due to prolonged development.
Influence of two methods of die…
DD dramatically slowed growth, especially in males, producing the slowest-growing but longest-lived individuals (especially DD40 males).
Influence of two methods of die…
3. Gender Differences
Under DR, females benefitted more in lifespan extension, similar to patterns seen in Drosophila.
Influence of two methods of die…
Under DD, males lived far longer than females because males delayed maturation much more extensively.
Influence of two methods of die…
4. Compensation Costs
Compensatory feeding helps maintain growth, but:
It increases metabolic stress,
Reduces survival,
Causes trade-offs between growth and longevity.
Influence of two methods of die…
🧩 Overall Interpretation
The two forms of dietary restriction affect aging through different mechanisms:
Intermittent Feeding
Extends lifespan by slowing adult aging, similar to many vertebrate studies.
Diet Dilution
Extends lifespan mainly by delaying maturation, not by slowing aging.
This demonstrates that dietary restriction is not a single biological phenomenon, but a set of distinct processes influenced by nutrient timing, concentration, and life stage.
🟢 Final Perfect Summary
This study reveals that dietary restriction can extend life in crickets through two pathways:
Intermittent feeding slows aging and extends adult life.
Diet dilution delays maturation and prolongs youth, especially in males.
Crickets showed complex compensatory feeding, developmental trade-offs, and gender-specific responses, confirming them as a strong model for aging research where both development and adulthood are important.... |